Wait!!!
You say that they might, in fact, NOT be the Beast and the false Prophet?
Now that's something I always though they were in the first place!In Revelations, could Jesus be the Beast and Paul the False Prophet in a symbolic sense?
I think the beast is the ';new world order'; the luciferians are creating and the false prophet will be a religious leader like the public pope.
It may also be the human who will be possessed by satan will be the black pope. Nobody knows for sure how the prophecy of the two beasts will be fulfilled. I think even the luciferians themselves don't know how they will fulfill the prophecy, but one thing is for sure: we are in the last days and the prophecy of the mark of the beast will soon be fulfilled.
To Him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be praise and honor and glory for ever and ever. Jesus Christ is Lord.
First of all, Jesus and Paul warned us against the beast and false prophet. If it were to be them, which it's not, then their warnings against them were false, therefore, we wouldn't have to be warned against them. Since that is the case, we don't need to be warned against Jesus and Paul. That must mean that they are good.
Second, when you can read something and interpret it literally, you do not interpret it symbolically to make it fit what you believe. You can take the true meaning of Revelation and interpret it literally. I have posted many indications that proves that statement on other questions in R%26amp;S.
In Revelations, you could really apply anything to anything, since no one actually KNOWS what they mean. Just alot of guesses, some of them educated, some not. So you COULD apply it there.
Only God can actually tell someone what Revelations means, and since no one actually believes they can just go and ask God for some education or revelation, they all run around preaching what they believe is true, but they never come to an understanding of the real truth about anything.
jesus was a men, nothing more. he was a nice guy who told people how lovely it would be if everybody would just get along with everybody( and some still wonder why he was crucified), but nothing more. hes not god( ain't such thing) hes not a spirit( ain't such thing) and hes certainly not a beast, or the beast or w/e.
and what about the ho ho ho of babylon that sits on seven hills? rome sits on seven hills. it took the universal church almost a hundred years to decide if the book of revelation should be in their bible.
Out of curiosity, not to flame you or anything, why do you say that? Rather, what do you base this on? I'm genuinely curious.
This is a leading question meant to provoke the feeling of a large number of concerned Christian in this forum.
Revelation.
absolutly not.
read it properly
That is absurd.
No.
Erm...NO!
NO IT ISNT....no it couldnt.....JESUS IS THE CHRIST....
WHY DO YOU GET SO MEAN to those who have diff opinions? do you fear them...
why do you come here???? theres hate speech in your profile
No comments:
Post a Comment