I don't hear atheists speak of false prophets very often.
Is the absence of a prophet's credibility implied by the title itself?Atheists: Do you think the term ';false prophet'; is redundant?
';True prophet'; = good con artist.
';False prophet'; = crappy con artist.
Either way, he's a con artist. The qualifiers ';true'; and ';false'; just refer to how many gullible sheeple have bought his bullsh*t, and how much money and/or loyalty the creep has managed to convince them to pledge to him and his cause.Atheists: Do you think the term ';false prophet'; is redundant?
A prophet doesn't have to be tied to religion, but many falsly assume so. By definition, if you walk in the middle of the street and I warn you that a bus is about to hit you, then I'm a prophet. If that bus hits you or not will determine if I'm false or real.
A true prophet isn't always someone who is ';gifted'; or ';inspired by God';. A prophet is someone who predicts events before they happen. A true prophet is sometimes someone who is just smart, experienced, logical, and someone who has vision (not to be confused with visions).
...Oops! You said Atheists only. I apologize. But we all get that a lot anyway, don't we?
Yes and yes. By the way, in the future you will meet a person you do not know and do not like! Beware and your welcome.
Yes. And ';true prophet'; is an oxymoron.
Yup, prophets really do not deserve any merit at all.
Absolutely.
its tautalogical
its like saying untrue lies
there's no such thing period !
How about:
ATHEIST= self deluding coward, a person that you can't trust....etc. sound?
Atheists god is the rectum.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment